Introducing high doses of gluten from four months of age into infants' diets could prevent them from developing coeliac disease, a study has found.

These results from the Enquiring About Tolerance (EAT) Study, published today in JAMA Pediatrics, by researchers from King's College London, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, St George's, University of London, and Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, suggest the early introduction of high-dose gluten may be an effective prevention strategy for the disease, though researchers say further studies are needed before being applied in practice.

Coeliac disease is an autoimmune disease whereby eating gluten causes the body's immune system to attack its own tissues. There are currently no strategies to prevent coeliac disease and treatment involves long-term exclusion of gluten from the diet. Even very small amounts of gluten in the diet of those with coeliac disease can cause damage to the lining of the gut, prevent proper absorption of food and result in symptoms including bloating, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and tiredness.

Previous studies exploring early introduction of gluten in infants have varied in the amount of gluten consumed and the timing of the introduction. The EAT study investigated the effects of gluten alongside breastfeeding, from the age of four months. The results were compared to children who avoided allergenic foods and consumed only breast milk until age six months as per UK government guidelines.

Infants in the intervention arm of the EAT study were given 4g of wheat protein a week from four months of age. This was in the form of two wheat-based cereal biscuits such as Weetabix, representing an age-appropriate portion of wheat.

1004 children were tested for antitransglutaminase antibodies, an indicator of coeliac disease, at three years of age. Those with raised antibody levels were referred for further testing by a specialist.

The results showed that among children who delayed gluten introduction until after six months of age, the prevalence of coeliac disease at three years of age was higher than expected -- 1.4% of this group of 516 children. In contrast, among the 488 children who introduced gluten from four months of age, there were no cases of coeliac disease.

Lead author Professor Gideon Lack, Professor of Paediatric Allergy at King's College London and head of the children's allergy service at Evelina London Children's Hospital said: "This is the first study that provides evidence that early introduction of significant amounts of wheat into a baby's diet before six months of age may prevent the development of coeliac disease. This strategy may also have implications for other autoimmune diseases such as Type 1 diabetes."

Author Dr Kirsty Logan, Researcher in Paediatric Allergy at King's College London said: "Early introduction of gluten and its role in the prevention of coeliac disease should be explored further, using the results of the EAT Study as the basis for larger clinical trials to definitively answer this question."

 

Story Source:

Materials provided by King's College LondonNote: Content may be edited for style and length.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/09/200928125028.htm 


Journal Reference:

  1. Kirsty Logan, Michael R. Perkin, Tom Marrs, Suzana Radulovic, Joanna Craven, Carsten Flohr, Henry T. Bahnson, Gideon Lack. Early Gluten Introduction and Celiac Disease in the EAT StudyJAMA Pediatrics, 2020; DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2893

 

People infected by the novel coronavirus can have symptoms that range from mild to deadly. Now, two new analyses suggest that some life-threatening cases can be traced to weak spots in patients' immune systems.

At least 3.5 percent of study patients with severe COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus, have mutations in genes involved in antiviral defense. And at least 10 percent of patients with severe disease create "auto-antibodies" that attack the immune system, instead of fighting the virus. The results, reported in two papers in the journal Science on September 24, 2020, identify some root causes of life-threatening COVID-19, says study leader Jean-Laurent Casanova, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator at The Rockefeller University.

Seeing these harmful antibodies in so many patients -- 101 out of 987 -- was "a stunning observation," he says. "These two papers provide the first explanation for why COVID-19 can be so severe in some people, while most others infected by the same virus are okay."

The work has immediate implications for diagnostics and treatment, Casanova says. If someone tests positive for the virus, they should "absolutely" be tested for the auto-antibodies, too, he adds, "with medical follow-up if those tests are positive." It's possible that removing such antibodies from the blood could ease symptoms of the disease.

A global effort

Casanova's team, in collaboration with clinicians around the world, first began enrolling COVID-19 patients in their study in February. At the time, they were seeking young people with severe forms of the disease to investigate whether these patients might have underlying weaknesses in their immune systems that made them especially vulnerable to the virus.

The plan was to scan patients' genomes -- in particular, a set of 13 genes involved in interferon immunity against influenza. In healthy people, interferon molecules act as the body's security system. They detect invading viruses and bacteria and sound the alarm, which brings other immune defenders to the scene.

Casanova's team has previously discovered genetic mutations that hinder interferon production and function. People with these mutations are more vulnerable to certain pathogens, including those that cause influenza. Finding similar mutations in people with COVID-19, the team thought, could help doctors identify patients at risk of developing severe forms of the disease. It could also point to new directions for treatment, he says.

In March, Casanova's team was aiming to enroll 500 patients with severe COVID-19 worldwide in their study. By August, they had more than 1,500, and they now have over 3,000. As the researchers began analyzing patient samples, they started to uncover harmful mutations, in people young and old. The team found that 23 out of 659 patients studied carried errors in genes involved in producing antiviral interferons.

Without a full complement of these antiviral defenders, COVID-19 patients wouldn't be able to fend off the virus, the researchers suspected. That thought sparked a new idea. Maybe other patients with severe COVID-19 also lacked interferons -- but for a different reason. Maybe some patients' bodies were harming these molecules themselves. As in autoimmune disorders such as type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis, some patients might be making antibodies that target the body. "That was the eureka moment for us," Casanova says.

The team's analysis of 987 patients with life-threatening COVID-19 revealed just that. At least 101 of the patients had auto-antibodies against an assortment of interferon proteins. "We said, 'bingo'!" Casanova remembers. These antibodies blocked interferon action and were not present in patients with mild COVID-19 cases, the researchers discovered.

"It's an unprecedented finding," says study co-author Isabelle Meyts, a pediatrician at the University Hospitals KU Leuven, in Belgium, who earlier this year helped enroll patients in the study, gather samples, and perform experiments. By testing for the presence of these antibodies, she says, "you can almost predict who will become severely ill."

The vast majority -- 94 percent -- of patients with the harmful antibodies were men, the team found. Men are more likely to develop severe forms of COVID-19, and this work offers one explanation for that gender variability, Meyts says.

Casanova's lab is now looking for the genetic driver behind those auto-antibodies. They could be linked to mutations on the X chromosome, he says. Such mutations might not affect women, because they have a second X chromosome to compensate for any defects in the first. But for men, who carry only a single X, even small genetic errors can be consequential.

Looking ahead Clinically, the team's new work could change how doctors and health officials think about vaccination distribution strategies, and even potential treatments. A clinical trial could examine, for instance, whether infected people who have the auto-antibodies benefit from treatment with one of the 17 interferons not neutralized by the auto-antibodies, or with plasmapheresis, a medical procedure that strips the antibodies from patients' blood. Either method could potentially counteract the effect of these harmful antibodies, Meyts says.

In addition to the current work, Meyts, Casanova, and hundreds of other scientists involved with an international consortium called the COVID Human Genetic Effort are working to understand a second piece of the coronavirus puzzle. Instead of hunting for factors that make patients especially vulnerable to COVID-19, they're looking for the opposite -- genetic factors that might be protective. They're now recruiting people from the households of patients with severe COVID-19 -- people who were exposed to the virus but did not develop the disease. "Our lab is currently running at full speed," Casanova says.

 

Story Source:

Materials provided by Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNote: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal References:

  1. Paul Bastard et al. Auto-antibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19Science, Sept. 24, 2010; DOI: 10.1126/science.abd4585
  2. Qian Zhang et al. Inborn errors of type I IFN immunity in patients with life-threatening COVID-19Science, Sept. 24, 2020; DOI: 10.1126/science.abd4570

Source:  https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/09/200924141529.htm 

WASHINGTON – The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) abruptly removed Covid-19 guidance Monday that warned there is "growing evidence" the coronavirus is airborne.

The health authority said the "draft" information was posted prematurely and added it is updating the guidance's language before reposting it.

"A draft version of proposed changes to these recommendations was posted in error to the agency’s official website. CDC is currently updating its recommendations regarding the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes Covid-19). Once this process has been completed, the updated language will be posted," the CDC said on its website.

The since-removed information about the way the virus spread was updated without fanfare Friday and was not reported on until Sunday when CNN published a story on the change.

While the agency maintains Covid-19 most commonly spreads when people are in close contact, it added Friday "that droplets and airborne particles can remain suspended in the air and be breathed in by others, and travel distances beyond 6 feet (for example, during choir practice, in restaurants, or in fitness classes)."

"In general, indoor environments without good ventilation increase this risk," it said, according to CNN.

It also reportedly shifted its language on asymptomatic transmission from saying "some people without symptoms may be able to spread the virus" to "people who are infected but do not show symptoms can spread the virus to others."

That has also been removed from the agency's website. (Anadolu)

 

Source: https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1116170 

MANILA -- The Department of Health (DOH) has submitted to the Office of the President a recommendation for an executive order (EO) issuance that will regulate the prices of swab tests for Covid-19, a health official said Monday.

"Napansin na natin ang (We have noticed the) differential pricing across different laboratories in the country and we also see the difference among laboratories as to how much a swab testing costs," DOH Undersecretary Maria Rosario Vergeire said in a virtual media forum.

Vergeire explained, "the EO will mandate the DOH and/or the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) to cap the prices and the national agency assigned will issue details like price ceiling through administrative policies".

"Bakit ba executive order ang hinihingi natin? Kasi ngayon mayroon tayong batas, ang batas na ito, nakasaad po diyan ang price ceiling sa medicines pero hindi po nakasama diyan yung sa (Why are we requesting for an executive order? There's a law now, and this law, it contains the price ceiling for medicines but not included are the) diagnostics and for professional fees, that's what we have tried to study," she said.

"We will conduct small surveys to determine (the) price range, same as what we do with medicines, and we will consult with experts plus DTI regarding the prices," she added. (By Ma. Teresa Montemayor-PNA

 Source: https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1116117 

MANILA – The Department of Health (DOH) is set to perform a pilot test on the use of antigen tests as new tools in identifying coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) infections.

In a media briefing, DOH Undersecretary Maria Rosario Vergeire said the department has proposed the pilot test to the Inter-Agency Task Force (IATF) to check the capacity of antigen tests in providing reliable results during Covid-19 screening.

Antigen tests, which also use swab samples, can reveal or detect if a person is currently infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Results may be released within an hour after the person has been tested.

Earlier, the World Health Organization recommended the use of antigen tests in case of unavailability of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests, congregate settings, or outbreaks.

"Alam natin ang Baguio ang napili kasi (We know Baguio was selected because) it has an efficient contact tracing system. They have good governance and management in response to Covid-19 and we can see the political commitment of their local officials headed by Mayor Benjamin Magalong," Vergeire said.

She added the DOH, medical experts and Magalong already had a meeting on Monday morning on the final guidelines and they will present to the IATF on Tuesday for approval. (By Ma. Teresa Montemayor-PNA

Source: https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1116088 

Subcategories

Featured Links

PNHRS

http://www.healthresearch.ph

PCHRD

http://www.pchrd.dost.gov.ph

eHealth

http://www.ehealth.ph

Ethics

http://ethics.healthresearch.ph

ASEAN-NDI

http://www.asean-ndi.org

Events Calendar

December 2024
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4